'I yearn to explicate the motive behind my fervour to that document etc’. In this respect one of my idol is a high profile commoner of the past, late ICS officer Qudratullah Shahab. For he- according to few- in terms of success has conquered both the world and hereafter, given his key postings in bureaucratic high offices and his humble and pro-poor policies as a manager. Howsoever, mystical promotions made by him and his acolyte Mumtaz Mufti in their repertoires have been in question ever since. In my contention there could be three possibilities for these mystical disclosures;( 1) they intentionally gave their manuscripts taste of fiction for seeking fame, (2) they underwent some psychological quiver, (3) all that they reported was factually correct. On that account my point is: discarding their scrolls as just fiction and equating their pointers to “fifth axis” as mere ploy for popularity would be harsh. Especially when, when we keep in mind the conviction, integrity and truthfulness of the two. Since former as an officer and a down-to-earth person was highly regarded and is widely accepted (beyond scope of my discussion). The latter as writer is known to be nastily candid in his style and had gained fair turf in the writers’ union earlier than he started contemplating on mysticism in his writings. Specifically, if one analyse ‘Alipur ka Aealy’ .First part of his biography written when he was not mysticized. The book had gained reasonable success and was nominated for Adamjee Prize .In this book he spoke truth to that level of cruelty and libel for himself and people closely related to him and had not spared anyone. In this context it is somewhat hard for me to reduce it to plain trick of attractiveness and distortion of fact.
Notwithstanding that fact that I personally believe them to be actual. The questions remains: what the two underwent was the product of psychological resonation, hallucination as being termed by renowned officer, writer and US base columnist of Daily Times and Friday Times Mr. Khalid Hassan. Or, was it a stroke of mysticism. Opinion of the leading analyst cannot be just ignored and ought to be lent credence as he -along with many others- has his methodical arguments otherwise. So... its is for the purpose of attaining synthesis of all these theses and antitheses I am dwelling in to all those related readings and opinions. Essentially trying to reconcile with that phenomena scientifically. I don’t know to what extent I will succeed.